An investigation by the BMJ has found that a lack of concrete Brexit guidance from the government is making it difficult for trusts to move beyond basic planning
An investigation published byĀ The BMJ reveals that NHS trusts are struggling to produce contingency plans for Brexit because of theĀ continuing uncertainty about the UKās future relationship with the EU.
Many have been unable to accurately forecast how crucial areas such as supply chains, medicines, and workforce will be affected after the exit deadline.
The BMJ sentĀ Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to all 231 NHS trusts in England and 26 health boards across Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland and received 182 responses (a 71% response rate), including 161 from NHS trusts and 21 from health boards.
The analysis found that only nine per cent of English trusts (15 out of 161 that responded) have established a committee or body to oversee preparations for Brexit. Out of the 21 health boards in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland that responded (out of a total of 26), 14 have set up a committee.
The BMJ also asked trusts and health boards to disclose any current risk assessment related to Brexit.
Only a quarter (26%) of those that responded (47 out of 182) were able to disclose this information, with a number saying they were still assessing the risk. Those that have been done are largely thin on detail and similar risks have often been assessed differently from trust to trust.
Saffron Cordery, deputy chief executive of NHS Providers,Ā told The BMJ: āAll of the uncertainty has just exacerbated an already difficult situation. Trusts have planned as far as they can, but so much of this is reliant on central government action.ā
The Department of Health and Social Care has said trusts are responsible for their own contingency activity. On Monday 17 December, theĀ health secretary Matt Hancock told the BBC’s Newsnight that the Department had instituted āfull no-deal planningā for the NHS.
Hancock has sought to reassure MPs that NHS supplies, workforce, and medicines regulation will be secure in the event of a no deal āif everybody does everything they need to do.āĀ But with the terms of Brexit still uncertain, much of the detail of what trusts actually āneed to doā is not clear.
The investigation did find that some trusts and health boards are taking action to support their EU staff, including paying for them to achieve settled status, while others have issued instructions not to stockpile medicines or write longer prescriptions for patients in the weeks leading up to Brexit, as requested by the government.
Commenting on the findings, Martin McKee, professor of European Public Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: āThe picture painted by these responses is extremely concerning. It is clear that any form of Brexit will have profound implications for the NHS.ā
He added: āEven though ministers have been unable to provide reassurance that patients will not die as a result of their policies, they have been unable to offer any useful guidance for trusts.
“It is inconceivable that the NHS will be prepared for anything other than a situation that, in effect, continues the current arrangements by the end of March 2019.ā
DonātĀ forget to follow us onĀ Twitter, or connect with us onĀ LinkedIn!
Be the first to comment